May 30,2025 – Germany’s new government led by Chancellor Friedrich Merz has launched one of the most ambitious economic spending initiatives in the country’s postwar history. At the heart of it is a €500 billion infrastructure fund, a ten-year plan to rebuild the nation’s physical and digital backbone, with the goal of revitalizing the economy while accelerating the shift toward clean energy. It is a staggering sum, twice the size of previous infrastructure spending plans. Furthermore, this public policy initiative marks a fundamental departure from the fiscal orthodoxy that has defined German fiscal policies for decades. However, the critical question remains: Can Germany deliver on this promise, or will it get bogged down in the bureaucratic inertia it is trying to escape from?
The package
The infrastructure package targets four key areas: transport, digital infrastructure, energy, and climate policy. Of the total sum, €100 billion is reserved for climate and energy-related initiatives, such as renewable power, grid modernization, and green technology development. The government aims to revive growth after years of economic stagnation, reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels, and future-proof Germany’s competitiveness in a rapidly shifting global economy.
To make this a reality, Germany needed to fundamentally rethink its approach to public investment. Merz’s government pushed through a constitutional amendment to loosen the Schuldenbremse, the country’s rigid “debt brake” law that has long limited structural borrowing. This legal shift allows Germany to finance infrastructure and defence investments without violating its fiscal rules. In parallel, the government established a special constitutional fund, or Sondervermögen, that enables long-term borrowing outside the regular budget. These moves had broad parliamentary support, reflecting a rare consensus between the CDU/CSU and SPD on the need for large-scale, debt-financed investment.
The challenge: from plans to reality
That said, translating large new funding into tangible improvements in the real world will likely present significant challenges. Germany’s infrastructure sector has long suffered delays rooted in its slow and complex planning and permitting systems. Projects like rail upgrades and highway expansions often take years to progress from planning to implementation. Even with new fast-track legislation designed to simplify environmental reviews and limits to legal objections, breaking through administrative bottlenecks remains one of the most significant risks to the plan’s success.
Another challenge is labour. The construction, engineering, and tech sectors face acute shortages of skilled workers, a problem compounded by demographic decline and limited immigration. Considering the complexities introduced by the uncertainty affecting global supply chains and ongoing inflationary pressures, it becomes evident that, despite securing sufficient funding, the implementation process is likely to be challenging.
Still, many economists believe the plan has strong potential. With effective management, the investment could boost annual GDP growth by over two percent. This growth will be driven by improved productivity, stronger public services, and expanded energy independence. However, this optimism is tempered by concerns over long-term fiscal sustainability, especially if growth fails to materialize as quickly or as strongly as projected.
Fast track and scale
This initiative is notably different from earlier efforts, not only due to the size of the funding to be allocated, but also because of the progressive mindset that informs its development. Under Angela Merkel and Olaf Scholz, infrastructure spending rarely exceeded 2.5% of GDP, and projects were often limited to maintenance and modest upgrades. The Merz government spending levels aim for 4 to 5% of GDP, with a range of projects that include not just traditional roads and bridges but also AI research, semiconductor production, EV charging networks, and high-speed broadband internet. This initiative encompasses not only the repair of existing problem areas, but also the development of long-range initiatives that will help Germany in its effort to retain its economic competitiveness.
Merz has adopted a strategy characterized by bold and decisive reforms to achieve this objective. His government’s fast-track planning laws borrow elements from pandemic-era emergency legislation, fast-tracking approvals and reducing red tape. Previous governments attempted similar reforms but lacked the political will or unity to push them through. Merz, backed by a CDU/CSU-SPD coalition now unusually aligned on economic modernization, has managed to overcome those obstacles.
A new economic doctrine for Germany?
Public and political reactions have been mixed. Many in Germany see the investment as overdue and necessary, given the country’s decaying infrastructure and the urgency of the climate crisis. Others, especially fiscal conservatives and opposition parties, worry about the risks of long-term debt and whether the government can manage such a vast program efficiently. The shift has been welcomed and watched warily in Brussels and other European capitals. Germany has long been the enforcer of strict EU budget rules, and its new borrowing model could set a precedent for others.
The €500 billion plan signals more than a shift in policy. Indeed, it may represent a new economic doctrine. After decades of prioritizing balanced budgets and incremental improvements, Germany is betting on scale, speed, and structural transformation. The success of these new investment is contingent upon factors beyond merely securing financing. Success will hinge on execution: faster approvals, effective project management, and the ability to mobilize labour and materials in a tight global market.
Germany possesses the necessary resources, financial stability, and political backing. The next crucial step is demonstrating its ability to deliver on these capabilities. The Merz government’s infrastructure gamble could redefine the country’s economic future or reinforce the gridlock it hopes to overcome.
Legal Disclaimer:
The Global Policy Institute (GPI) publishes this content on an “as-is” basis, without any express or implied warranties of any kind. GPI explicitly disclaims any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information, images, videos, or sources referenced in this article. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of GPI. Any concerns, copyright issues, or complaints regarding this content should be directed to the author.
![]() |
Laetitia von Schönburg is a researcher with the Global Policy Institute. She was born and raised in Germany. She holds a Comparative Literature and Culture degree from Royal Holloway University of London. Her academic background includes the Middle Eastern Studies Program at the University of Saint Joseph in Beirut and the History and Culture of Korea at Korea University in Seoul. |