Thank you to everyone who joined the GPI-BAU Talk Series: Shaping the Future of Arab Media: Algorithms, Change, and Society Missed it or want to revisit the discussion? 📌 Watch the full recording here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wSzUO_225U
watch hereThank you to everyone who joined the GPI-BAU Talk Series: The Collision of Internet Analytics, Big Data, AI, and Communication: The Robots Are Coming for Our Jobs Missed it or want to revisit the discussion? 📌 Watch the full recording here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_LCTiIjYuo
watch hereThe Eternal Africa: Colors & Shadows is coming to BAU! Explore the powerful work of Mubarak Abbas, celebrating Africa’s beauty, culture, and resilience. 📅 Nov 18–20 | 9AM–5PM (OPEN FOR PUBLIC) ✨ Meet the Artist: Nov 20, 5:30–7:30PM (Registration required)
register nowBy Janice Tagoe When President Donald Trump unveiled America’s AI Action Plan in July 2025, it was framed as a blueprint for national technological dominance. The 90+ policy recommendations span deregulation, infrastructure, and diplomacy, and their implications for health care, specifically mental health, cannot be overemphasized. Mental health conditions affect tens of millions of Americans, and access to care remains uneven. Could the federal government’s AI roadmap spur innovations that make high-quality support more accessible, efficient, and personalized? Recent research and industry initiatives suggest the answer is yes, but only with deliberate safeguards and inclusive investment. Laying the Groundwork The Action Plan calls for accelerating innovation by removing regulatory hurdles, expanding infrastructure, and building international partnerships. Several provisions speak directly to health care. It urges federal agencies to create regulatory sandboxes and AI Centers of Excellence where researchers and startups can test AI tools under the supervision of agencies like the FDA and share data transparently. It also recommends launching domain-specific initiatives in sectors such as healthcare to develop national standards for AI systems and measure productivity gains.
read moreBy Dr. Nishakant Ojha NEW DELHI - November 11, 2025 - In contemporary warfare, dominance is no longer defined by the size of an army or the range of its missiles but by control over the invisible yet decisive electromagnetic spectrum. The ability to detect, disrupt, or deny information flow across this domain has become the cornerstone of modern conflict. Electronic Warfare (EW) has thus evolved from a tactical support mechanism into a strategic instrument for shaping the outcome of wars. Among global powers, China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has emerged as a formidable force, integrating electronic, cyber, and space capabilities to construct a multi-domain system that directly challenges both India and the United States. The PLA’s Strategic Transition Toward Electromagnetic Supremacy Over the last decade, China has transformed its military doctrine through what it calls Integrated Network and Electronic Warfare, a concept that merges cyber operations, space-based intelligence, and electromagnetic control, into a single offensive continuum. This concept underpins the PLA’s System Destruction Warfare doctrine, which focuses not on the annihilating enemy forces but on crippling their ability to perceive, communicate, and respond effectively.
read moreThank you to everyone who joined our special event featuring Kateryna Odarchenko and the launch of her new book, The Game of Campaigns. Hosted in collaboration with Global Policy Institute, Bay Atlantic University, and SIC Group USA, the discussion explored the strategy, ethics, and technology behind modern political campaigns. If you missed the event or would like to revisit the conversation, the recording is now available.
watch hereThank you to everyone who joined us for the seminar “Global Macroeconomic Outlook and Markets,” hosted by the BAU Department of Business in collaboration with the Global Policy Institute. We were honored to hear from Eylem Senyuz, Senior VP & Senior Global Macro Strategist at Truist Advisory Services, with moderation by Professor E. Mehmet Goksu. The session offered valuable insights on global economic trends, policy developments, and the forces shaping today’s financial markets. Missed it or want to revisit the discussion?
watch hereThank you to everyone who joined us for GPI-BAU Talk Series: Implications of TRIPP in the South Caucuses with guest speaker Ahmad Hashemi, Director - GPI Middle East and Central Asia Program. Moderator, Professor Jason Hutchison, Political science and International Relations at Bay Atlantic University (BAU). Missed it or want to revisit the discussion?
watch hereBy Yashasvi Ojha NEW DELHI - October 28, 2025 - India and the United States share one of the world’s most dynamic and multifaceted trade relationships. In the past two decades, the U.S. has consistently ranked among India’s largest trading partners, with bilateral trade crossing $200 billion in 2024 according to the U.S. International Trade Administration. The relationship is driven by complementary strengths—India’s manufacturing and services capabilities, and America’s advanced technology, capital, and market demand. However, the partnership has not been without friction. Since 2018, the United States has introduced several tariff measures aimed at reshaping its global trade posture—focusing on fair competition, domestic job creation, and reducing dependency on certain foreign markets. India, though not the primary target, became part of this recalibration. The imposition of tariffs and the withdrawal of India’s Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) status were major inflection points that forced a rethinking of India’s export strategies and bilateral trade approach. Historical and Policy Context The Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program, established in 1976, provided duty-free access for many Indian goods to the U.S. market, benefiting over 3,500 product categories including engineering goods, leather, gems, and textiles. In June 2019, the U.S.
read more